|
|
|
(Page 4 of 4)
The group submitted a redesign proposal on October 20th,
2006. The plan would shift much of the care provided in Charity’s
inpatient setting to “medical homes” that offer “health promotion, disease prevention,
health maintenance, behavioral health services, patient education, and diagnosis
and treatment of acute and chronic illnesses.”
The strategy is to reduce hospital utilization and therefore costs by
increasing coordination between primary and specialty or tertiary care. Patients
like the one Jeff Wellborn delivered to the West Jefferson ER would have access
to treatment and medications before the police pick them up in the middle of the
night. Uninsured residents would also enjoy more access to health care in their
own community, and their doctors could address many illnesses, such as diabetes,
hypertension, or depression, before the diseases created an emergency.
The plan would also expand eligibility for publicly-funded
insurance for most low-income residents, including those with serious mental
illnesses. The price tag for the
reform proposal was over $500 million. A range of public funding sources,
including a desired infusion of federal funding, would finance the expanded
coverage. Critics of the plan,
however, argue that it would surpass the cost of providing access through the
old Charity system. Furthermore,
while the initiative allows for the continued presence of a public hospital in
downtown New Orleans, it does not expressly address the
issue of rebuilding Charity. In
January 2007, funding for a joint
Charity-VA
Hospital received initial
approval from the Louisiana Recovery Authority, though it strongly encouraged a
smaller facility that complements the Collaborative’s system-wide
recommendations, and the hospital complex still needs legislative and federal
approval.
Increased coverage will address the issue of
parity in health care access, something lacking in the former “two-tier” system.
According to a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers report,
The Quality Conundrum, most Americans
think ‘equal access’ is the number one quality indicator for sustainable health
care. Byron Harrell, former CEO of a
New Orleans hospital, opines in a Times-Picayune editorial,
“Countless times, people with nowhere else to turn found a medical provider at
Charity
Hospital.” People with
somewhere else to turn—i.e., the insured—almost always went somewhere else.
The op-ed concludes, “Having a flexible insurance system is
not nearly as strong a commitment to our neighbors as the physical presence of
real facilities with medical care being delivered by real professionals.”
Well informed critics of the new plan,
like Mr. Harrell, may be reacting to the binary decision that LSU and the
Collaborative have posed to the public through their constant friction.
They have asked us to choose either Charity or an insurance plan that is
underdeveloped and under-funded and they have made it an “us or them” equation.
New Orleans
probably needs the institution of Charity to return in some form, but it cannot
be the only safety-net option for the uninsured.
If Charity reaches capacity or is forced to close for unpredictable
reasons, the continuum will break again.
A more equitable distribution of public funding for the uninsured and the
services this population uses across hospitals of all types, as well as more
extensive health coverage throughout the population, will deliver more
equitable, cost effective care.
In making our decisions about the city’s health care system
in the wake of Katrina’s floods, we should take these three lessons to heart:
New Orleans’ health care crisis reflects a lack of coordination and flexible
funding and is not simply a supply shortage; the health of a population depends
on consistent access for all patients; and a good solution in health care must
be sustainable. Of course,
‘sustainable’, is a bloated word in New Orleans; health care must endure fiscal
mismanagement, crime, poverty, and water up to 2.4 meters.
One thing that Katrina proves is that water-resistant health care isn’t
just a brick building—it might be a plastic insurance card.
Chris Weaver is a
former member of the Catholic Charities of New Orleans
and is currently a journalism student at the University
of Maryland. Adele Shartzer
works for the Kaiser Family Foundation.
<<Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
|
|